|
|
No to Farcical Enquiries; Shame
on the NHRC for its Partisanship
|
 |
Jamia Teachers’ Solidarity Group
rejects the NHRC’s report on the Batla House ‘encounter’, which gives a
clean chit to the Delhi Police. The NHRC claims that on the basis of the
“material placed before us, it cannot be said that there has been any
violation of human rights by the actions of police”. Indeed, we would
like to know what material was placed before the NHRC for inspection.
The NHRC enquiry into the case, one will remember, came far too late,
and that too at the insistence of the High Court. For months, the NHRC
refused to take any initiative to independently enquire into the
‘encounter’ which several civil rights groups, including JTSG, deemed
suspect. The NHRC enquiry was carried out in an inexplicably secret
manner; even applications by residents of Azamgarh to depose before the
Commission were not acknowledged by the NHRC. If
people of Azamgarh, the family members of the accused and killed boys,
civil rights groups who have been working and campaigning on the issue
were never heard by the Commission, we wonder what was the material that
was placed before the Commission. It appears that NHRC, like the
Lieutenant Governor prior to this, was satisfied by hearing the police
version alone.
|
|
The JTSG
Report, Encounter at Batla House: Unanswered Questions, a damning
indictment of the police version had been submitted to the Commission
earlier this year. By ignoring all contrary voices, the NHRC has proved
itself to be a brazenly partisan body, and damaged its own standing and
independent credibility.In its bid to carry out the dictats of the
State, the NHRC even chose to forgot that the Delhi Police had
consistently violated even its own guidelines about encounter killings.
Worse still, a body which is supposed to act in the interests of the
human rights of the country’s citizens, pronounces that an ‘encounter’
did not involve any human rights violation only tells us about its
flawed and distorted understanding of human rights and subverts the very
basis of its guidelines. |
 |
|